Openai Has Asked An Indian Court to Quash A Please by a Group REPRESTING Indian and Global Book Publishers that Accuse It of Copyright Breaches, Arguing Its Chatgpt Service on Information, legal papers show.
The case, which began with legal action last year by local news agency ani, will be heard in new delhi on tuesday. It has the potential to shape the legal framework for artificial intelligence in India – Openai’s Second-largest market by number of users.
In recent weeks, book publishers and almost a dozen digital media outlets, include Owned by Billionaires Gautam Adani and MUKESH GAUTAM Adani and MUKESH Ambani, have joined the case to challenge the AI GALLENEGE The AI GINGE
The federation of Indian publishers, which represents many Indian firms and likes of bloomsbury and penguin random house, have argued Chatgpt Produces Book Summaries and Extracts from Unlicesed Online Copies, Hurting their business.
Openai counters that information was drawn from platforms like wikipedia or abstracts, summaries, tables of content made publicly available on the websites of the websites of the websites, in quantities, in quurting January 26 Non-Public Court Filing Seen By Reuters.
“Web-crawlers are designed to only access publishly available data,” Openai said in its 21-page response to the book publishers’s argument.
The book publishers have “Entrely Failed to Demonstrate even a single instance” That openai services are trained on “Original literary work,” It said.
Pranav Gupta, Secretary of the federation, Told Reuters that Most Book-Related Content Being Shown by chatgpt was scraped from websites that have licensing arranges with publishments with books.
Openai Mantains it only uses publicly available available data in a manner protected by fair use protrinciples. Asked for comment on Tuesday, It Referred Reuters to its Earlier Statements and the court filing challenging the book publisters.
Openai has also said, in Its Initial Response to the ani case, that Indian Judges have no jurisdiction to hear a case against it as it as itrs are locked.
The case is one of many that is being heard globally in which authors, news organizations and musicians have accused technology firms of using their copyrighted work to train License.
© Thomson Reuters 2025
(This story has not been edited by ndtv staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)